Multi-Institutional Collaboration Broadens Understanding of Pablo Picasso’s Methods and Materials in Early Career
Cornell University, National Gallery of Art, The Phillips Collection, and Winterthur Museum employ technical analysis in exploration of Picasso’s masterwork The Blue Room.
Washington, D.C.—In June, the image of an underpainting hidden beneath the surface of The Phillips Collection’s The Blue Room (1901) by Pablo Picasso was publicized by the Associated Press to great international fanfare. Ongoing work to reveal details of the contemplative man painted in the hidden image—his facial features, dress and identity—has been part of a years-long collaboration between the Phillips, Cornell University, National Gallery of Art, and Winterthur Museum.
Driven by the Phillips, the research and technical analysis shared between these four exceptional institutions has also helped to yield a broader understanding of a 20th century master and his early artistic process. The technical details of this scientific analysis will be presented by Winterthur Museum’s Dr. Jennifer Mass at the Synchrotron Radiation and Neutrons in Art and Archaeology Meeting (SR2A 2014) in Paris, September 9–12. The presentation will address the palette and painting methods Picasso used for the two works and the relationship between those palettes. The presentation will also explore the wealth of information acquired through the combination of the cross-section studies, molecular analyses, hyperspectral reflectance imaging, and XRF imaging.
The Phillips hopes that the collaborating institutions will continue their research efforts as the museum prepares for a 2017 exhibition that centers on The Blue Room, curated by Associate Curator for Research Dr. Susan Behrends Frank. Picasso scholar Marilyn McCully is collaborating on the concept of the exhibition, especially contributing to those aspects which relate to Picasso’s artistic practice at this early point in his career.
THE BLUE ROOM—AN EARLY MASTERWORK
Acquired by The Phillips Collection in 1928, The Blue Room is celebrated as one of Picasso’s earliest masterworks. The painting holds a seminal position in Picasso’s career, created at a time when the young artist was trying on different artistic personalities as a 19-year-old prodigy on his way to becoming an artistic titan of the 20th century. It is both summary painting and origin painting—situated at a critical juncture during Picasso’s second trip to Paris, when he had assimilated the influences of the work of his French heroes and contemporaries into a single work that is wholly his own voice, reflecting on the art of his time. An iconic work that is one of the earliest Blue Period paintings, The Blue Room is both a synthesis of the bather and toilette themes laced with the symbolist overtones of the time and also the first manifestation of the model in the studio in Picasso’s oeuvre, a subject that will obsess the artist throughout his life. It is also representative of a completely new experiment in picture-making for the young Picasso, where the space of the room is conceived as part of the narrative and variable perspectives are combined in new ways. Painted in the fall of 1901, The Blue Room is an historic masterwork essential to our understanding of Picasso’s pictorial vision—a work that speaks essential truths about Picasso’s art at the end of one century while looking forward to a new era.
camera and a longwave-pass spectral filter —and obtained a clear image of the face and torso of a man underneath the painting. Delaney returned to the Phillips to continue imaging efforts in 2012, leveraging his recent developments in reflectance imaging spectroscopy and using the Gallery’s one-of-kind multi- and hyperspectral imaging cameras to further examine the hidden portrait.
In addition to these various technical analyses, Favero spent numerous hours examining the painting in the Phillips’s conservation studio, seeking to understand Picasso’s process.
“The collaboration between the institutions and experts involved in this project has allowed us to make great strides in our understanding of The Blue Room and Picasso’s materials and methods for painting it and the hidden portrait,” Favero said. “In addition to identifying the man in the portrait, we want to determine the pigments in the hidden painting to get a better idea of what the composition may have looked like in color.”
FITTING THE PIECES TOGETHER
On April 21, 2014, The Phillips Collection arranged an informal gathering of all the project participants to review the results of technical study that has been carried out thus far on The Blue Room. Each of the collaborating conservation scientists and their teams gave short presentations summarizing the results of their analyses. Their conversation revealed much about the early Blue Period work, including that the portrait, though unsigned, appears to be a completed picture. Further, the pigments used in both paintings are identical, increasing the likelihood that both were painted by Picasso’s hand.
The team found large areas of unmixed color and some evidence that Picasso mixed colors “wet-into-wet”—that is, wet paint blended directly on the canvas—in the hidden painting. Upper paint layers appear to be more deliberately mixed, and while there is some degree of “wet-into-wet” mixing in The Blue Room, it appears Picasso was doing more mixing of the paint on his palette before applying it to the canvas. Also, examination of the painting through the microscope and analysis of paint cross-sections found no obvious “picking up” of wet paint from the hidden painting, strongly suggesting the paint of the portrait was mostly dry when Picasso painted over it, possibly with as little as three or four months in between.
“Each analytical technique yielded excellent and illuminating new information about both Picasso’s early Blue Period masterpiece and the portrait underneath,” Favero said. “But it took collaboration of all parties to be able to draw additional, important conclusions about the picture”